Case of 3-years-old Danis Pasic

Case of 3-years-old Danis Pašić 

Mother murdered her 3-years-old son to go on holiday to Macedonia

On 23 May 2017, 32-year-old Chiara Rojnić Pašić from Pula, Croatia, and her 14-year-old half-sister both decided to kill Chiara’s 3-year-old son, Denis Pašić. After the commitment, Denis was drugged suffocated, and then his corpse was thrown into the river. On the evening of the same day, Chiara reported Denis’s disappearance to the authority, telling that he had gone missing at around 6:30 PM while playing in the close garden. Still, there were a lot of parts in Chiara’s report that did not make sense and so she finally broke down and admitted to police what had gone on. The second morning, on 24 May, she brought the authority to the area where she disposed of Denis’s body. After a more detailed search, Denis’s corpse was discovered and sent for a postmortem.

It was shortly confirmed that he had been strangled before being thrown into the river and had undergone a brutal death and had apparent wounds and evidence of strangulation and suffocation. When the medical examiner determined Denis’s reason for death, Chiara said to the officer that she tied him in a blanket, set him into his stroller, and once she came to the area of disposal, she then took his corpse to the shoreline. The pair were caught and charged with killing. In April 2018, Chiara was convicted to 33 years in jail along with 2 years of mandatory psychological therapy. Her junior accomplice was sentenced to 3 years in a young offender's institution.

The valid intention is unknown, but references indicate that Chiara killed her son because she liked a new life with her boyfriend who did not want kids. She scheduled to go on holiday with her new boyfriend after she kills her son.

After the killing many acquaintances say that she never looks after Denis, she sometimes hit him, leaving him all day alone, and sometimes they hear Denis shouting and crying.

According to announcements, the Supreme Court of the Republic of Croatia announced that the defendant exhibited such cold-blooded planning, persistence, and brutality in committing the crime that the earlier sentence is explained.

The country’s highest court rejected the defendant’s plea as baseless and reportedly approved the second-instance judgment, thereby confirming her 33-year sentence.

Local media told that she is incapable to appeal against the decision of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Croatia